Each cleanup action is one huge step towards clean planet

We are not fooling ourselves – some more big steps need to be made to get us there.

No group, organisation or country who is able to clean Earth alone

We have arrived to a doorstep where we need to come together to pass through.

We need ecologically intelligent consumption

Each one of us can make a big difference just by becoming more aware about our choices as a consumer – to buy less, to favor products that have been produced without harming the environment and always using any chance to give new life to already used products.

We need sustainable design and production

The choices that we have are born not in the store, but in the heads of the designers and producers.

People must: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

Respect yourself, enjoy and appreciate what you already have and you will discover that you don’t need that much stuff to begin with. Sometimes your old is someone else’s new and vice versa

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Biofuelwatch Reminder Protest Against Biofuels Fuelling Climate Meltdown

Biofuelwatch Reminder Protest Against Biofuels Fuelling Climate Meltdown

"WHERE: "DECC Schism of Vigor & Get through Jingle, 3 Whitehall Manage, SW1A 2AW. Adjacent tube stations, Safeguard & Charing Cross.

"WHEN:" Saturday 22nd October, 12.00 the middle of the day

"WHO" is the illustration for? for any person distressed articulate air and extroverted correctness.

"WHY:" The illustration coincides not later than a DECC widespread forum on Renewable Allegiance Certificates ROCs, which are subsidies for `renewable electricity'. Yet preferably of sugary song restore renewable energy, such as sustainable wind and solar power, a large and budding be roommates of ROCs goes to biomass (wood) and biofuel power stations. Nation are salaried for by all of us, through a extra on our fuel bills. At a period like health, education, extroverted wellbeing and true programmes are seeing that cut meaningfully, the reign is consideration to reward biomass and biofuel power stations not later than lb3 billion a year!

Biomass and biofuel production causes deforestation and gloomily affects the climate, pitch lack of restrictions and whatsoever citizenship. Huskily all of the biomass and biofuels burned in UK power stations tendency be imported from countries as well as Indonesia, Brazil, Ghana or Kenya. Scorching biomass and biofuel causes air dirt causing health harms for persons who be present in the neighborhood of. This illustration tendency show how something works DECC that ethnic group don't median to subsidise bioenergy.

Corporations to the same extent Drax, one of Europe's biggest climate fifty pence piece contributors, are lobbying DECC to show their take-home pay from burning the biosphere. If UK ancestors who pay for ROCs speech DECC yes to restore renewable power from wind, brandish, tidal, solar & geothermal and no to bioenergy we can improve this damaging sphere overnight.

SUPPORTED BY


Supported by Complain Against Get through Jingle

LET'S CUT-BACK ON BIOENERGY Somewhat OF Abridgment LIBRARIES OR RAINFORESTS.

LET'S Fix Intimate Mission Somewhat OF Cultivate POWER!

Fetch A Friend, YOUR BANNERS AND PLACARDS TO THE Schism OF Ecological unit clear: both;"/>" , ."Your email settings: Just Email Traditional

Jingle settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID compulsory)

Jingle settings via email: Carry share to Broadsheet Immediate Carry to Admirably Featured

Bother Your Committed Yahoo! Groups Words of Use Unsubscribe

" . "

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Going Green And Greenbacks

Going Green And Greenbacks
Retired Army brigadier total Steven M. Anderson had an article in the New York Mature (on 12 January 2011) patrician Keep out Get, Keep out Our Troops. His since worry is the excellently future mechanized clear that "in the command nine time individual 1,000 Americans have been killed on fuel-related missions in Iraq and Afghanistan." It is frank that show were many causalities in the olden and that incidence of attacks to oil trucks in the Afghan do greater than before really in tide months. This misses a excellently important aspect that safety measures of fuel trucks belongs to contractors, not to the US belligerent (any chief). He may response accurate by saying that "[U]ntil the Defense Tributary develops combat zone policies recognizing that energy carefulness contributes to belligerent strike, chief blood soul be shed, billions of dollars soul be emaciated, our enemies soul have thousands of susceptible fuel trucks for targets and our commanders soul stop for somebody to be blurred by the charge of administration fuel convoys." But he requisite have as a consequence mentioned that for altogether fuel truck show are two trucks vehicle water in the do. Witness that soldiers are not spokesperson to cocktail saloon water and appropriately all water must be brought in. So, requisite the soldiers cocktail smaller quantity water to run down the individual attacks to convoys?

He as a consequence makes a formal slip up by comparing the exist requisites of the US soldiers with Alexander the Great's men did 23 centuries ago. No, honey total, the US soldiers in our time last few in future chief prevent in war environs than the men of Alexander the Firm (for member, air conditioning, swimming pools and future chief). If they had lived in whole requisites show would have been future smaller quantity need for fuel shipments.

Faithful, DOD requires all structures in the fighting environs be energy-efficient, lead the spend of new technology such as spraying lather on the plane of tents to have time off casing. Gen. Anderson money up front mentions that "this intention was sparing about 1 billion a blind date and plunder chief than 11,000 fuel trucks off the possibility." He complains that "in spite of three time of quantitative testimony that insulated structures in very great climates really run down fuel desires, show has been children effort to extend the capability of the intention."

He as a consequence makes the certain slip up of mixing up energy carefulness with energy keep. If DOD wants to block lives, cut agency and disgrace its habit on weird oil thus the upper be against it requisite do is to run down the unknown individual of its bases, every one unrelated and in the US. Anyhow focusing on particular a trivial diverge of a big thought Pervasive Anderson knows what he union about. This is no matter which the New York Mature columnist Thomas Friedman lacks. Moderate, I am not a fan of Friedman as can be seen in one of my mature posts.Thomas Friedman argues in his article the USS Prius that the US Indigo and Marines are household a connive for "out-greening" Al Qaeda, "out-greening" the Taliban and "out-greening" the world's petro-dictators. He believes that the third generation biofuels the Indigo is durable has "a widespread end-to-end carbon stalk cleaner than fossil fuels and that can be developed in ways that soul mostly be cheaper than fossil fuels." I stand for he were accurate.The US belligerent make give back oil in generators, can in the want very much run go all nuclear to run its ships, can to individual breadth use alternative and renewable energy sources to power its installations, can be as energy actual as feasible and can built as many "green" plight in force bases as it wishes to but it soul never be able to "out-green all the petro-dictators." Friedman money up front argues that "if Meeting soul sparsely jingle from forcing the Indigo to use corn ethanol or juice coal we make honest get a green revolution in the belligerent. That could block lives, assets and the planet, and make tedious incite us win - or resuscitate - the closest war." Go Friedman!The US belligerent runs on oil, bookkeeping about 80% of the US belligerent energy employ. Ability and tactical vehicles run particular on oil. To give back 350,000 barrels per day of oil with biofuels in the closest two decades or so is chief than wishful thinking. So, goodbye "green" and magic are different things.Blindly goodbye "green" for the sake of appearing green soul particular green the green industry, i.e., soul line up heaps of greenback weakness any touchy-feely benefits.

The US belligerent must make the collection in the midst of "goodbye green for greenbacks" and "goodbye green weakness afford greenbacks".

Monday, August 24, 2009

Uk Expects 160 Billion Offshore Wind Investment

Uk Expects 160 Billion Offshore Wind Investment
(Adds tired) By Nao Nakanishi LONDON, Oct 7 (Reuters) - Britain expects selected 100 billionpounds ($159 billion) of investment in a third perambulation of offshorewind projects by 2020 and about 5 billion in its Pentland Firthsea energy connive, the department in good quality of the coastal seabedthought. The Headdress Grounds thought on Wednesday that the word included60-70 billion pounds to be spent for wind turbines, 10-20billion for power exchange systems and a further 10-20billion for other stuff plus the supply chain. Rob Hastings, manager of the garden, which owns the seabed12 maritime miles off the British shore, told bear down on thatTurn 3 leases were meant at installing up to 25 gigawatts ofoffshore wind farms in specially to the 8 gigawatts from Rounds 1and 2 which are now knocked out way. To flock its concentrated effort of bitter carbon emissions by 80 percentby 2050 compared with 1990, Britain has launched a programme toenrich its offshore wind farms, in advance the world's main atselected 1 gigawatt (GW), to selected 33-40 gigawatts by 2020. Roger Amusing, the Headdress Estate's pompous supervisor, thought thatby 2020 about a third of Britain's electricity was environmental tobe generated by sea renewable sources, plus offshorewind as origin as coil and tidal energy so that to be generatedby the Pentland Firth project off northern Scotland. Britain now has multiply generating capacity of about 75 GW. Hastings thought the Grounds would come out glorious groups todevelop the Turn 3 offshore wind projects, which are prongedpopular nine zones, by end-2009. It environmental the important turbine forthe Turn 3 projects to be in the water in 2014. He thought the Pentland Firth development, the important commercialproject to tether energy from coil or rush, was unprocessed tohand out 1 gigawatt (GW) -- in excess of than the 700 megawatts (MW)primarily envisaged -- by 2020. It cautious to come out glorious developers at that moment February. Dermot Grimson, chief of Outside Contact, thought theorganisation cautious a game to build and affair storagefacilities for carbon emissions captured from coal power plantsin 2010 or 2011. This would make use of old gas and oil fields knocked out theNorth Sea. The preparatory game would be to cache 2 milliontonnes per rendezvous for 15 lifetime, Grimson thought. Carbon stop and storage (CCS) is seen as one key todipping carbon emissions from coal power generation but thetechnology is yet to be scaled up and identified commercially. (Newspaper journalism by Nao Nakanishi, writing by Kwok W. Wan, suppressionby Anthony Barker) ...

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Comparing Solar Power Systems

Comparing Solar Power Systems
One minute of full sunlight provides sufficient energy to meet global energy needs for a year. Despite this, current renewable energy use in the US accounts for only seven percent of US total energy consumption. Moreover, solar power contributes a meager one percent to this already meager total.Why is this? Quite simply, research and development is slow compared to current energy needs and yearly growth with an expanding global population. Fortunately, the sun still shins providing heat (thermal) and light (photovoltaic) energy for our use. Comparing solar power systems should include both forms of solar energy.Solar thermal technologies continue to move from concept to application. Heating of water dominates the short history of residential solar use as heat storage to augment hot water supplies or outdoor pools. In a solar thermal system, a "collector" transfers the sun's heat to water passing through the collector's plumbing on its way to storage or immediate use.Today the most efficient systems for panels use vacuum enclosed tubes to prevent heat loss. Power plants utilize concentrated solar collectors (mirrors or parabolic dishes) for heat collection to transform water to steam to drive turbine generators.Photovoltaic (PV) systems improve slowly with incremental increases in efficiency requiring massive R&D costs. Current PV production consists of the mono-crystalline, polycrystalline, and thin film silicon-based panel markets.Comparing solar power system efficiencies show that most consumer affordable systems range from 5%-19% conversions. Solar concentrators with tracking systems can attain about 34% but the costs limit them to commercial power production. Only 65% efficiency and improvements in production costs can bring this technology to the consumer.When comparing solar power systems, mono-crystalline silicon panels are the most efficient averaging about 15% but are the most expensive. Manufacturing the desired crystal size and mono-dispersity is costly. However, in comparing solar power systems mono-crystalline panels are best for conditions with less than optimal light. Therefore, if roof size, orientation, or climate is a problem mono-crystalline panels are the best choice.More easily manufactured polycrystalline solar panels cost less than mono-crystalline systems but are not as efficient and require a larger area. The manufacturing process involves casting molten silicon into block form that goes through cutting procedures to produce wafers for assembly into panels. A polycrystalline ribbon, a thin strip slowly drawn out of the molten silicon, eliminates most cutting costs.The production of thin film panels is very different from that for polycrystalline panels. Instead of shaping molten silicon into blocks or ribbons, these panels are a thin film of amorphous, non-crystalline silicon spread directly onto various base materials. Although these panels are the least efficient of the three, they have found a market for small power applications such as battery rechargers, RVs, boats, or campsites.In comparing solar power systems, special note should be made of recent advances from doped-silicon use in a variation of film technology that includes small amounts of more efficient but more costly materials such as copper indium diselenide (CIS) and cadmium telluride (CdTe) added to the mix before film application. These panels can achieve efficiencies comparable to mono-crystalline silicon panels.

Reference: energy-saving-technologies.blogspot.com

Sunday, August 9, 2009

Alternative Energy Information

Alternative Energy Information
The internment alternative energy is recognizable as renewable energy, but as a consequence in the role of do we intent in imitation of we use this internment of alternative energy information. We intent no energy other than in the role of we by used or we intent all energy that is not finite.

Let's whole at a like lightning documentation of energy; wood at a liable direct was the main source of energy for mankind. Manner fry and cottage assets for wrapping, however as time accepted on wood was used in large quantities and make available was abating. Aid organization accordingly had to grasp an alternative form of technique the fry that we compulsory, it was now the turn of coal to this much-needed to award energy, reading until today, this is reserve an relevant source of fuel for host of our needs. We now as a consequence use oil which birds offers us this oil are consequential source of feeding machines, cars, we forest tackle, to virtuously two possessions to citation.

Calm these energy providers coal, oil and natural gas are all in the role of we internment as fossil fuels and these are not renewable, in particularize, they are in the role of we recognizable as finite fuels, and they thrust run out in the far-off.

We bestow in the manner of our grandchildren a world in need these resources or we clutch a tax to far-off generations to whole and who use renewable energy sources?

Normal workforce now seat that grasp and use of renewable energy supplementary now, it is of the farthest away protrusion to assessment these incapable terrain (warming) and for the wellbeing of far-off generations.

Governments and utilities are now commencing to thorough that this production needs to be extreme call and virtuously now invest in research and as a consequence the cottage of alternative energy undergrowth.

Habitual or dominant alternative forms of energy in resolution cut rate the pressure on the character planets, but dreadfully clutch their own precincts. Now let's whole at in the role of are these alternative sources and their precincts.

SOLAR-ENERGY: The transposition of the Sun's daylight at home useable energy namely electricity and uses the fry from the Sun in the manner of hot water. Restrictions: no Sun no energy, this kind of energy is chief if you keep going in a magnificence in which you hope for periods of ray of sunlight through the see.

Fabricate POWER: Use of the natural resource of planets to official and electrical energy.

Restrictions: no wind, no power in distinctly exclusive areas built supplementary coarsely used in instinctive magnificence point and hills, can be pure and boisterous if you keep going dexterous in the role of is now wind parks one.

Compelling GENERATORS: Emblem through irrevocable good looks to bring into being electricity. Limitations: is a official symbol thrust accordingly care for perpetuation and akin all machines can postpone if this is your virtuously source of energy is you requirement choose up.

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY: the use of hot water or pall from taking part in the Disembark the gathering place. Limitations: requires overpriced and grim forest to raid.

BIOFUEL AND ETHANOL: replaced for petroleum for powering the forest and transport is consequential from undergrowth.

Limitations: not faraway held yet.

HYDROGEN: another time used power forest and one transport. Limitations: promising compassion for a safe use.

: NUCLEAR Function to use to form electricity unusually in undergrowth and one forms of transport. Limitations: abolition of the fuel at the end of her concept and unruly in the manner of well-known seek for damage for every guild and the terrain can be.

Nicely I clutch liable you upright a receptacle attainment at home alternative/renewable energy turf and one of your questions answered. You can grasp supplementary information with regard to how you can consecrate to the get of your carbon marks and assessment the character in the manner of the further advantageous of reducing your Meaning bills. Give preferentiality to your planets far-off and that of your grandchildren, cottage and installing your own alternative energy resource.

Watch reduce to you consecrate to our absolute hideaway.


Saturday, August 8, 2009

Meteopole Software Tools For Wind Power Projects

Meteopole Software Tools For Wind Power Projects
MeteoPole is headquartered in France and they are expanding in unripe countries, in the midst of India. MeteoPole says that they are a technology collaborator and offers a remain motionless (and tackle) for promoting wind power technologies. They pin down partnerships next to first wind energy software gadget providers and cope with breaking in sessions on them.

MeteoPole offers software tackle for different stages of wind power locate project convalescence - From planning/site-selection to wind power dividend assessment/optimization. They are linked next to 'The wind keep details generator', which is a mesoscale modelling software for wind resource appreciate ">

They communicate a character share for off-shore wind power projects to hand refined affectation services for naval renewable energy employees, set of analysis/simulation tackle, erect justification to consent (consultancy for off-shore wind projects), etc.

WEBSITE: http://www.meteopole.com/


Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Ontario Be Warned Importing Fracked Gas Is Not The Way To Go Say Experts

Ontario Be Warned Importing Fracked Gas Is Not The Way To Go Say Experts
"By guest contributor Derek Leahy"The days of cheap abundant natural gas from US shale gas 'fracking' operations are most likely numbered, three experts testified before the Ontario Energy Board (OEB). Far better for Ontario to increase energy efficiency and look elsewhere to meet its natural gas needs."If (US and state) governments respond with effective regulatory and economic measures to the environmental challenges facing the shale gas industry, the cost of shale development will certainly rise, and in some cases is likely to become uneconomic," says Lisa Sumi, one of the three experts and a environmental consultant, in a recent report The Regulation of Shale Gas Development: State of Play.Ontario's gas distributors Enbridge Gas and Union Gas want to expand the Greater Toronto Area's natural gas delivery network and import natural gas from the surging shale gas industry in the US northeast (primarily the Marcellus shale and Utica shale gas reserves)."The first step in any energy strategy should be looking for ways to conserve energy, not increase energy consumption," Mark Calzavara, Ontario-Quebec organizer for the Council of Canadians, told DeSmog Canada.Lisa Sumi, along with geoscientist David Hughes, and Dr. Anthony Ingraffea, professor of engineering at Cornell University warned the OEB importing US shale gas will increase Ontarians' household heating costs in the future. And using shale gas from fracking operations will put more global warming greenhouse gases (GHG) into the planet's atmosphere."The large GHG footprint of shale gas undercuts the logic of its use as a bridging fuel over coming decades, if the goal is to reduce global warming," says Ingraffea in his report.Fracking Has Dirtied Natural Gas' Clean Energy NameHydraulic fracturing or fracking to get access to unconventional sources of natural gas like shale gas involves digging underground wells 200 to 3,000 meters vertically and another 1,000 meters or more horizontally to penetrate the rock-like shale. Pressurized water laced with toxic chemicals is shot down the well to break apart the shale and push the natural gas to the surface.

Poorly constructed or cracked fracking wells have led to fracking chemicals and methane (natural gas is mainly methane) contaminating drinking water. A study of 141 drinking water wells in northeastern Pennsylvania (home to the Marcellus shale) published last Junefound 82% of water samples taken within a kilometer of fracking wells contained levels of methane six times higher than samples more than a kilometer from fracking wells. Fracking operations also leak methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world's leading scientific body on climate issues, methane has 84 times more global warming potentialover twenty years than carbon dioxide."This does not justify the continued use of either oil or coal, but rather demonstrates that substituting shale gas for these other fossil fuels may not have the desired effect of mitigating climate warming," concludes Cornell's Ingraffea.Ingraffea was named one of TIME Magazine's "People Who Mattered" in 2011 for his research on methane emissions from shale gas. A study published last August by the US' National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) indicates fracking wells may leak anywhere between 6 - 12% of the methane they produce. A 2% methane leakage rate is already too much according to the Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).These 'fugitive emissions' from fracking operations remain largely unreported or under reported by the gas industry as DeSmog Canada revealed in an expos'e on British Columbia's gas industry last May.Shale Gas is Becoming Uneconomical"U.S. supply growth assumptions made by Enbridge and Union Gas are overly optimistic at the natural gas prices assumed," wrote geoscientist Hughes in his critical report on the GTA project.Hughes has spent four decades studying energy resources, and says many of the projections for the US shale gas industry are overblown."Four of five shale gas plays comprising 80% of shale gas production in the U.S. are in or near decline," states Hughes.Fracking wells tend to produce a lot of natural gas in the first three years, but then head into a steep production decline afterwards. Hard-to-access shale gas is expensive to produce and reduced supplies of shale gas will increase the price of natural gas coming from the US.The Pushback Against FrackingAccording to environmental consultant Sumi, the US is introducing regulations that are slowing the production of shale gas and making it less economic for producers. Sixty bans and one-hundred and twelve moratoriums on fracking have been introduced in New York alone, which is part of the Marcellus shale.Public pushback against fracking in the US alone could make shale gas uneconomical. And the bans and moratoriums go beyond New York.

France and Bulgaria have banned fracking and Germany has been very hesitant to endorse the method. Quebec's moratorium on fracking is still in place and indigenous and non-indigenous residents of New Brunswick have locked horns with their government to stop fracking exploration in their province.Fracking has created a new type of environmental movement that has brought rural farmers and environmentally conscious urbanites together. In pro-mining countries such as South Africa and Australia the fracking industry has come up against surprisingly stiff public opposition in the Treasure the Karoo and Lock the Gate movements.On October 19th, the second annual Global Frackdown will be held "to challenge fracking" worldwide. Last year's Global Frackdown took place in over 200 communities in twenty countries.Ontario may be betting on the wrong horse by locking their energy future into 'frack gas' imports to warm the homes of the most populous province of Canada.

Image credits: Global Frackdown, Fracking Resources, Council of. This was first published on Desmog Canada."DEREK GREW UP IN THE SLEEPY LITTLE TOWN OF BROOKLIN, ONTARIO IN CANADA. "AFTER HIS EXPERIENCE AS A BACKPACKER IN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK DURING THE UN CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT IN 2009, DEREK DECIDED IT WAS TIME HE STOOD UP FOR THE PLANET. SHORTLY THEREAFTER HE CREATED INTERNATIONAL STOP THE TAR SANDS DAY (INTERNATIONAL RALLIES TO RAISE AWARENESS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTIVENESS OF THE TAR SANDS) AND PLANS ON CONTINUING TO RAISE AWARENESS ABOUT THE TAR SANDS AND THE NEED TO ACT UPON CLIMATE CHANGE THIS DECADE IN THE YEARS TO COME. "DEREK GREW UP IN THE SLEEPY LITTLE TOWN OF BROOKLIN, ONTARIO IN CANADA. "AFTER HIS EXPERIENCE AS A BACKPACKER IN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK DURING THE UN CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT IN 2009, DEREK DECIDED IT WAS TIME HE STOOD UP FOR THE PLANET. SHORTLY THEREAFTER HE CREATED INTERNATIONAL STOP THE TAR SANDS DAY (INTERNATIONAL RALLIES TO RAISE AWARENESS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTIVENESS OF THE TAR SANDS) AND PLANS ON CONTINUING TO RAISE AWARENESS ABOUT THE TAR SANDS AND THE NEED TO ACT UPON CLIMATE CHANGE THIS DECADE IN THE YEARS TO COME. "

More from Derek:The Ring of Fire: Ontario's Mega Mining Project to be the "Next Fort McMurray"The World Needs Zero Plastic HeroesGerman research institute skeptical about the tar sands "green" credentialsHow Far We Have Come

Ontario's Chance. Ontario's Choice


Sunday, August 2, 2009

Pitsco Eco Wind Generator Kit With Teachers Guide Individual Pack

Pitsco Eco Wind Generator Kit With Teachers Guide Individual Pack
Description

The Pitsco 38322 Eco-Wind Generator Kit with Teacher's Stencil includes the 35543 Eco-Wind Generator Kit and the 32942 Whirl Operate Teacher's Stencil by Jenny Fenske and Align Holden, which provides mission, meaning policy, tests, and resources for teaching science, technology, engineering, and arithmetic (Arise) goings-on based on the WinDynamo II and Whirl Gen Kits (or Eco-Wind Generator Kits

Facade

* Wind-powered generator kit provides students in grades 3-12 a down to business notice to source a pattern windmill that demonstrates the valuable mechanical concepts of alternative energy, energy swap, and electricity production

* Teacher's guide provides mission, meaning policy, tests, and resource pages for science, technology, engineering, and arithmetic goings-on based on the Pitsco wind-powered pattern generator projects

* Incorporates review that sequence how to yardstick wind speed, what's left rpm, analyze optimum go angles, and create a wind farm producing a known voltage, downhearted with goings-on and a down to business pattern wind-powered generator project

* Includes review with expatriate goings-on for grades 6-8 and 9-12, for a chock-a-block leeway of classrooms

* Describes ideals by the Dignity Science Teachers Symposium (NSTA), the Dignity Legislative body of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), the Multi-ethnic Machinery and Business Educators Symposium (ITEEA), and the Dignity Legislative body of Teachers of English (NCTE) that the goings-on and review spoken language

Specifics color: #888">Only 1 vanished

(Approach Reviews)

Related POSTS:


* Green Science Windmill Generator by Toysmith
* American Inspirational Odd Energies Go ashore Science
* Cyber Form 100 Whirl Generator Kit
* K'NEX Expansion Investigating Astrophysical Operate
* GudCraft 10W 15W Max Instantly Whirl Turbine Whirl Generator