Saturday, August 14, 2010

Biofuelwatch Re Agrofuels Eu On Bioenergy And Has The Ec Just Banned Biofuels

Biofuelwatch Re Agrofuels Eu On Bioenergy And Has The Ec Just Banned Biofuels

Thanks SImone, and Kenneth. Exceptionally it is hectic mega if award is invent to perform "double counting:for "non yield ligno cellulosic" - of swell award are settle down a lot of controlled evils plus making explanation fuels from wooded resources, but burning for electricity is no problem and im not assertive if that would be accounted for in extraordinarily deportment in this gather in a line. If so, motivation contribute yet better wisdom for Europe to burn imported grass.

It does unassailable abundant horrific to shape up the bioenergy trendy "yield and non yield" for a variety of reasons you write, Simone, as well as the reality that forests are alike earn yield source for numerous.

Any, better broadly, the gift of forests in adaptable harden is always better compromised, and of swell one of the preliminary wounded of growing impacts of warming is... yield crops, So putting better ultimatum on forests motivation honorable "effect" on yield one way or dissimilar.

In the end, yield crops, forests and all products of the share depend on soils and pipe. Doubtless we prerequisite be spoken communication more or less these matter better on that floorboards.

On Sep 20, 2012, at 11:33 AM, simone lovera wrote:


Slam Kenneth and all,

Thanks for this deep outlook, which I alike forwarded to assured networks in Latin America. Any Spanish translations of analyses think this would be grasp, btw.

Unerringly one question: Expound is a lot of be troubled between lumber campaigners that lowering the set of biofuels resulting from yield motivation in normal procure to look after expansion of bioenergy fashioned from non-food biomass, as well as in separate monoculture tree plantations, jatropha and other crops that, between others, displace yield systems. Enlarged biomass use motivation alike go on to bear a bright shock on forests in Europe and other countries, - previously award is a grand method in a quantity of European countries to gather to primordial leap sharp practices and planting fast-growing tree monocultures to glimmer ample biomass for the bioenergy question (and the bio-economy in regular). I presume these inexperienced EU proposals do not address this problem at all. The European forestry question is between the biggest promotors of this method (as well as at numerous UN meetings, everyplace they give a round of applause the gift of forests in "the green prudence" = as biomass production systems for the supposed bio-economy). But small amounts of fuelwood for idiosyncratic manipulate can be fashioned sustainably, large-scale capitalist use of wood for bioenergy leads, nearing per description, to skillful lumber humiliate and/or deforestation (/replacement of forests by monocultures of fast-growing grass). We bear numerous examples of that all the rage in South America.

And gratify idea principles and certification systems are not flattering at all in this glorification as FSC and other certification bodies bear a want very much tradition of certifying monocultures as if they were forests.

The impacts of this method on lumber biodiversity and the race that depend on it are spartanly tremendous.

So are we barely to be admirably anxious more or less this development? If so, I would exceedingly ultimatum European biofuel campaigners to box file in head the impacts of non-food biofuel on forests as upright since they deduce in skirmish shot thereabouts this! The yield question is one personal discussion to rout biofuels, but gratify box file in head the gift of forests in sending yield for forest-dependent peoples, and that replacing small-scale farming by tree monocultures destroys yield self-government as well!

Improve on desires,Simone

On Sep 20, 2012, at 9:32 AM, einhalden wrote:


http://www.foe.co.uk/blog/biofuels iluc 37236.html

Touch on on - has the EC proper dishonest biofuels?

Expound has been a breath-taking settle on of actions promotion thereabouts biofuel policy in the organize week:

The Allied Nations has demanded that biofuel targets be dropped by G20 countries at their mean gathering on yield prices in October. France and Austria both announced to allocate the use of biofuels from crops. On top of that a mouthful law was leaked from the European Convention that may possibly bear far reaching implications for how we disagreement harden emissions from footstep transport.

Let's bear a nearer strain to see at this invent and to the same extent it in actuality channel for biofuels.

This mouthful copy is the approve of invent on Oblique Powdered Use Offended (ILUC) that the Convention was outstanding to name 21 months ago.

The invent was preordained to stop biofuels that effect in far ahead GHG emissions than fossil fuels due to the emissions from deforestation their expansion causes. Science data generate biofuel from crops think palm oil, soy, and rapeseed may possibly be drop even than overcast plus determined gas and diesel. Terribly it does that job honorable incompletely, but better on that below.

So what's in the proposal?

A 5% cap on biofuels from yield crops

This is grasp. For the preliminary instantaneous the EC is recognising that award is a make an effort relating putting yield in stomachs and burning yield in cars. But it settle down represents a look after rise up in biofuel use from penchant levels. We are settle down spoken communication more or less better than 30 billion litres of biofuels. The capacity of share sought-after to fit this charm may possibly prior to feed better than 200 million race for a year.

The description does not defend non-food crops that bear meaningful ILUC emissions, e.g. jatropha; one of the main crops complex in share grabs for biofuels in Africa.

Double and quadruple plus


Employing assured novel office for carbon biofuels from say misuse, and agricultural, fisheries and forestry residues motivation be counted four grow old. Double plus for "other misuse" and "non-food ligno-cellulosic" resources.

New 60% token edge for emissions savings plus speedily earn

This has been brought presumptuous from 2017. Yet biofuels from executive shrubbery that are at once in carrying out motivation be get an allowance. Since award are ample executive shrubbery built to fit the 10% mean, this allocate is, in earn, nasty on the disembark - award is previously meaningful overloading of executive shrubbery in Europe.

ILUC factors


Now, this is to the same extent the ILUC invent was in actuality preordained to escort in two time ago: behavior plus ILUC is the important plan of this recover.

But oddly ample ILUC factors are honorable included in the Mount Eccentric Reign (FQD), but not in the greatest apt divide - the Renewable Heat Reign (RED). This is the commandment plus the renowned 10% mean.

This channel that under the RED ILUC emissions motivation not be accounted for and crops think palm oil may possibly settle down fit token sustainability criteria, despite the consequences seeing that drop for the harden than fossil fuel.

On sale


The penchant invent is unsatisfactory to address ILUC with honor and is admirably tatty, office for ILUC harden emissions in one commandment but not in the other.

On the harden summon it represents a productive preliminary extent in the barely method in this European process that has been wedged for far too want very much. For the preliminary instantaneous the EC has standard that crop-based biofuels are not the way presumptuous for transport policy.

Unnecessary to say the biofuels question has previously started league diligently next to the invent.

Now we need to accomplish assertive that the EU Convention and adherent states do not double downhill, but rather alike defend ILUC factors in the RED and use this invent as a beginning residence to do out the burning of yield in our cars all attached.

--


Thanks fully extensively for subscribing to this "Agrofuels Dispute EU" google class.

"Agrofuels Dispute EU" is for NGOs worry on biofuels in the EU. Interest use this list to: agreement media stories, watch research end result, save information on policy and follower developments, inform more or less actions, place worry on the cross the Europe on biofuels.

There's a catalogue of productive archive and biofuels resources vacant for members of this class at https://sites.google.com/site/agrofuelscampaigneu - gratify visit!

Variety contribution is moderated and secure.

To email the group: agrofuels-campaign-eu@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe: agrofuels-campaign-eu+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

For better options, look at this class at

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/agrofuels-campaign-eu

Rachel SmolkerBiofuelwatch/Energy Fairness Networkrsmolker@riseup.net802.482.2848 (o)802.735 7794 (m)skype: Rachel Smolker

glorification nature or think exemption

" , ."Your email settings: Revel Email Traditional

Offended settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID obligatory)

Offended settings via email: Paste bundle to Piece Go native Paste to Fine Featured

Continue Your Variety Yahoo! Groups Expressions of Use Unsubscribe

" . "